• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Ward Law, LLC

  • Home
  • Practices
    • Commercial and Business Litigation
    • Construction Litigation
    • Directors and Officers Liability
    • ERISA and Employee Benefits
    • General Corporate
    • General Liability
    • Homeowners/Condominium Associations
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Labor and Employment Law
    • Professional Liability
  • Team
    • ATTORNEYS
      • Jennifer Ward
      • Barry Brownstein
      • Jeremy Rogers
      • Christopher Curci
      • Mark Stephenson
      • Ross G. Currie
      • Deborah Gnatt
      • Renee Harris
      • Robert H. Graff
      • Xiaoyu Pu
    • staff
      • Fred Hosaisy
      • Alix Fequiere
      • Alisha Gasper
      • Alyssa Wilson
      • Phylise Wilson
      • Lauren Shission
      • Christian Ear
      • Dillon J. Berry
  • Blog
  • News
  • Diversity
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Contact Us

EEOC Reminds Employers That “RIGID” Leave Policies Are A Costly ADA Violation

September 16, 2019 By Ward Law, LLC

By: Christopher M. Curci, Esq.

The EEOC issued a press release on 9.10.19 announcing a $550,000 settlement with an employer who violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) by having a rigid 12-week maximum leave policy.  Connections, CSP, Inc. is a Delaware company that provides services for Delaware’s corrections facilities and other state institutions.  The EEOC alleged that the company violated the ADA by having a rigid policy that refused to allow employees more than 12-weeks of leave for disabilities. The settlement highlights a frequent misapplication by many employers of the intersection between the ADA and the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”).

As shown in this case, Connections complied with the FMLA’s requirements of granting 12 weeks of leave, but failed to recognize that the ADA can also require an employer to grant additional leave beyond the 12 weeks.  Further, Connections’ rigid 12-week policy was an easy target for the EEOC by creating a “hard line” reasonable accommodation when the law is clear that one does not, and cannot, exist.  The result: a $550,000 settlement and some bad press.

StraightforWARD Legal Advice:
When an employee presents a health issue to an employer and requests a leave of absence, most employers are familiar with the FMLA’s 12-week leave provisions.  However, many employers make the fatal assumption that the FMLA is the only law that applies.  It is not.  Employers must also consider the ADA and state disability laws and evaluate whether additional leave beyond the 12 weeks would be a reasonable accommodation for the employee’s disability.  There are very few “hard line” rules regarding how much additional leave time is “reasonable” versus “unreasonable.”  Various courts across the country have reached different conclusions, including some holding that several additional months of leave can be reasonable under certain circumstances.

The attorneys at Ward Law are experts in all areas of employment law.  Christopher Curci regularly defends employers against all matters of employment litigation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.  He also provides daily counseling to his clients on employment law compliance, conducts in-house employment law training, and is a frequent lecturer at trade associations and employment law presentations with the National Business Institute.  He can be reached at ccurci@thewardlaw.com and 215-647-6603.

Filed Under: Blog, Employment Tagged With: Employment

Footer

Philadelphia, PA
One Penn Center
1617 John F. Kennedy Blvd
Suite 500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 647-6600


New York, NY
15 West 38th Street
4th Floor, Suite 740
New York, NY 10018

(646) 380-1823

Moorestown, NJ
39 E. Main St
Moorestown, NJ 08057

(856) 637-4200

Tampa, FL
8875 Hidden River Pkwy
Suite 300
Tampa, FL 33637

(813) 558-3387

Copyright © 2025 · Ward Law, LLC & MyAdvice · All Rights Reserved